Committee on Climate Change demands a foot is kept on the gas

Say what you want about the Committee on Climate Change, theyโ€™re not backwards in coming forwards. And their recent analysis of the Clean Growth Strategy was typically direct.

The Committee highlighted a number of concerns, but fundamentally its analysis concluded that vital โ€“ and legally binding โ€“ carbon emission targets would be missed if the Government didnโ€™t translate the aspirations of last yearโ€™s Clean Growth Strategy into a clear and measurable programme of projects, initiatives, policies and targets. They warned the goal of getting rid of all petrol and diesel cars by 2040 was worth little without a clear roadmap of how to get there. And they added to the considerable body of reservations over the viability of Hinkley Point C.

Doubtless ministers in BEIS werenโ€™t exactly thrilled to hear the Committeeโ€™s conclusions. Government is inevitably sensitive to criticism, and this administration particularly so since a General Election that was supposed to deliver a landslide Conservative victory but went (if you are of a Conservative persuasion) horribly wrong. But actually, should ministers in BEIS be looking at the Committeeโ€™s conclusions with a degree of, dare we say, thanks?

The principle criticism levelled at the Clean Growth Strategy was it was long on content but short on finite action. And in that respect, the Committee on Climate Changeโ€™s analysis is neither hugely revelatory nor fundamentally unfair. It is the case that the UK is in danger of missing emissions targets. But, by and large, response to the ambition of the Clean Growth Strategy was positive. And in including clean growth as a โ€˜grand challengeโ€™ within the subsequent Industrial Strategy White Paper, ministers cemented it as a plank of domestic policy.

The Committeeโ€™s comments arguably provide a further impetus for BEIS ministers to drive this agenda. And letโ€™s not forget the Government is very much in need of a positive narrative on the domestic front as ministers and civil servants grapple with the complexities and ructions of Brexit.

What the Committee is essentially saying is โ€“ if youโ€™ll pardon the pun โ€“ the Government needs to keep its foot on the gas. And if ministers progress the Clean Growth Strategy with finite policies โ€“ which will influence everything from transport to addressing the housing crisis, then they could develop a domestic platform that can serve as a legacy outside of Brexit.

Exit mobile version
Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram Who's Top Who's Not